The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) has quietly published its process for deciding when knowledge of cybersecurity vulnerabilities is kept secret.
This is the first official acknowledgement that the ASD might not disclose all of the vulnerabilities it discovers. However, knowledge of secret vulnerabilities would have always been an essential part the agency’s toolkit for offensive cyber operations.
The document “Responsible Release Principles for Cyber Security Vulnerabilities” was posted on the ASD’s website on Friday.
The policy stresses that the agency’s starting position for when it finds a weakness is to disclose it and work with vendors to ensure that patches are available before it is made public.
“Occasionally, however, a security weakness will present a novel opportunity to obtain foreign intelligence that will help protect Australians. In these circumstances, the national interest might be better served by not disclosing the vulnerability,” the policy reads.
“The decision to retain a vulnerability is never taken lightly. It is only made after a careful multi-stage expert analysis, and is subject to rigorous review and oversight.”
Also: Cyber blitzkrieg replaces cyber Pearl Harbor
ZDNet understands this isn’t a new decision-making framework, but one that has been in operation in various forms for quite some time. It’s being made public as part of ASD director-general Mike Burgess’ strategy to bring the agency “out from the shadows” and to dispel the notion that it warehouses large numbers of zero-day exploits.
The key decision-making principle is that the national interest to keep a vulnerability secret must strongly outweigh the national interest of disclosing it, based on the existence of a “critical intelligence requirement”.
“This might happen if the weakness allows us to gather foreign intelligence that will prevent a terrorist attack, for example,” the policy reads.
The ASD also considers whether retaining the vulnerability runs the risk of a malicious actor taking advantage of the weakness, as well as what preventative measures might be needed to protect Australian interests.
Newly-discovered vulnerabilities are first assessed by the Equity Steering Group consisting of working-level technical experts. ZDNet understands that both the cybersecurity and offensive cyber operations sides of the ASD are represented, and that the discussions can be robust.
If that group recommends a vulnerability should be retained, it is then considered by the Equity Board made up of officers at the Senior Executive Service pay grades.
See: ACSC tightens access controls for Australian government systems
Decisions to retain vulnerabilities are reviewed quarterly by the director-general, and annually by the independent Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS). Briefing IGIS to her satisfaction is understood to be a daunting experience.
The retention of each individual vulnerability is also reviewed after 12 months.
ZDNet understands that at the end of this assessment and review process, the number of vulnerabilities retained for ASD use is very small, an amount that would not be characterised as “warehousing”.
Australia’s Huawei ban a ‘resolved’ question: Payne
Australia has made its sovereign decision, says Marise Payne. Other nations will make their own.
Australia should name parliament cyber attackers
In the case of such a blatant attack on Australia’s institutions of government, we should stand ready to point the finger and impose some real costs on the adversary.
Australian web hosts hit with a Manic Menagerie of malware
Criminals used compromised web hosting servers to mine cryptocurrency, and insert advertising and SEO tools into customer websites.
ACSC dumps annual conference, partners with AISA for cyber events
Australia’s cybersecurity agency joins the nation’s peak body for cyber professionals to deliver development programs through the government’s Joint Cyber Security Centres.
Australian government lags UK in deploying DMARC email spoofing prevention
DMARC email authentication can significantly reduce the risk of phishing attacks, but only 5.5 percent of Australia’s main government domains have deployed it. That’s set to change.
Australia’s encryption laws are ‘highly unlikely’ to dragoon employees in secret
Relax, developers, the Assistance and Access Act is ‘highly unlikely’ to force employees to deceive their bosses by creating secret backdoors. Nor does it breach Europe’s GDPR digital privacy laws.
Credit: Source link